swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Aug 18, 2016 19:29:32 GMT
|
|
|
Authored by tiger99 on Aug 26, 2016 12:37:40 GMT
Graet stuff, thanks for posting. Against Mariott, SCO had no chance at all. But their lack of factual support for McBride's allegations also had something to do with it.
IBM were taking no chances, so sensibly they hired the best. But I don't think his considerable talents were necessary. I think Judge Wells summed up the problem SCO had, "Is that all you have got?"
On the other hand he deserves a boost to his career following the demise of SCO because he brought tangible benefit to the whole world. One of the good guys. He must be very patient, as must have been the various judges, to stick with what should have been a quick and simple case for so long.
I wonder what happened to the reputations of the lawyers acting for SCO?
|
|
|
Authored by wol on Aug 27, 2016 15:07:38 GMT
I wonder what happened to the reputations of the lawyers acting for SCO? They got a boost too? For keeping a dead turkey airborne for so long? Cheers Wol
|
|
|
Authored by wayneborean on Aug 27, 2016 17:20:31 GMT
I wonder what happened to the reputations of the lawyers acting for SCO? They got a boost too? For keeping a dead turkey airborne for so long? Cheers Wol No impact. Outside of a very small minority of geeks, no one else cares about this case. It isn't important to the rest of the world. Which is unfortunate, because most of them would back us if they knew about the case, and how stupid it was.
|
|