TheManStan
Guest
|
Authored by TheManStan on Jan 14, 2017 13:36:40 GMT
|
|
|
Authored by wayneborean on Jan 14, 2017 14:31:42 GMT
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Jan 16, 2017 20:04:00 GMT
it's been so long that now I have to remember what's being appealed...
(sadly, that's at least partly serious)
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Jan 16, 2017 20:08:07 GMT
Hmmmm - it occurs to me (a few minutes later) that SCO may actually be relying on that.
|
|
nsomos
Veteran Member
Posts: 140
|
Authored by nsomos on Jan 16, 2017 20:15:20 GMT
Any bets that the judge will pretty much just ask with incredulity why SCOG are even bothering. The dead horse that they are continuing to beat, has been dead for so long that all the flesh has rotted away and even the flies are now gone. Wildflowers have been springing up and it is hard to even see that it was any sort of corpse at one time, much less a horse.
The BSF folk who drew the short straw for this appearance will bluster and say how unfair all previous events have been and how much they should have previously won and that if only this judge will give them a chance, they can finally effectively hint at how horribly unfair IBM has been to them and their cause. It'll be coulda, woulda, shoulda ... and please please please.
Hopefully the judge (who also drew a short straw) will beat them down and just rule no, no!, NO!!
|
|
charlieturner
Veteran Member
Above ground, and still breathing.
Posts: 37
|
Authored by charlieturner on Jan 17, 2017 1:07:12 GMT
If it is like the last appeal (SCO v Novell), it will be a 3 judge panel, and they were not interested in Stuart Singer's (of BSF) line of argument at all. I would bet that the judges in this court might just talk to each other about previous appeals filed by a party, and will not suffer any smoke and mirrors this time, either. As I sat there watching the arguments take place, it was quite obvious the those judges were having none of SCO's, er, "stuff".
|
|
MSS2
Guest
|
Authored by MSS2 on Jan 17, 2017 17:52:05 GMT
So, is anyone going?
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Jan 24, 2017 21:07:51 GMT
I'd *love* to, as I'm betting that the judge(s) will have some "interesting" questions for SCO. I can't justify the expense, though. For me, that date just represents when I'm going to start watching for a transcript...
|
|
nsomos
Veteran Member
Posts: 140
|
Authored by nsomos on Jan 24, 2017 21:32:26 GMT
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Mar 14, 2017 18:57:42 GMT
8 days and counting... I wonder if PJ still has that red dress ready?
|
|
MSS2
Guest
|
Authored by MSS2 on Mar 15, 2017 22:49:51 GMT
swmech, you're presuming that if SCO loses the appeal, this thing is over. I'm not sure I believe that.
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Mar 16, 2017 18:59:54 GMT
Not presuming - but definitely hoping....
|
|
|
Authored by tiger99 on Mar 17, 2017 13:32:40 GMT
My birthday is on the 25th. This could be a nice present, slightly early, if justice is done.
Or will we have to wait weeks or months for the verdict?
|
|
MSS2
Guest
|
Authored by MSS2 on Mar 28, 2017 1:05:07 GMT
Any word? Anywhere?
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Mar 28, 2017 19:05:28 GMT
Nothing that I've seen/found... Pacer *may* have something, but a) I doubt it'd be available that quickly, and b) I don't have an account to check anyway.
|
|