swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Aug 30, 2021 19:15:49 GMT
Is it over? Not quite, but the long-still body just twitched. "SCO's" trustee just announced a proposed settlement with IBM. In an article by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols This means that the end of SCO vs IBM may finally be in sight, subject to the courts' approval of the proposed settlement (PDF available here, but I don't have the exhibits referenced in that). I'm not sure that I LIKE this ending. I think that the payment should be in the other direction, and I would have REALLY preferred an actual judgement against SCO. But getting that judgement would likely have cost IBM more than the $14.25M settlement amount, and I'm sure that bottom line figures into IBM's acceptance. Note that this doesn't affect the Xinuos suit. As Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols wrote in the article: "With one step forward and one step back, we move ever so slowly to the end of SCO vs. IBM." Other sources (will update as I find them):
|
|
|
Authored by sk43999 on Sept 5, 2021 0:07:05 GMT
I don't particularly like the ending either, but we need to remember that ALL of the Linux claims have been dismissed, and the only remaining claim (Unfair Competition) is/was a purely SCO/IBM issue having to do with Monterey and AIX. Back when Caldera bought the Unix assets from Santa Cruz, Ransom Love (CEO of Caldera) made a big deal of acquiring Santa Cruz's rights in Monterey. Why? Because it gave Caldera something important that it lacked at the time. CREDIBILITY. Ransom wrote a long article about his time at Caldera and his views on Linux, Caldera's business model, why partnering with IBM was important to Caldera, and his take on the SCO-IBM lawsuit. Here's one of many chapters, probably the most relevant: Ransom Love on SCO Lawsuit The whole Monterey saga is too long to recount here, but there were broken promises made by both IBM and Santa Cruz, so the question of who owed whom in the end and how much is one of those questions with no definitive answer. I could easily make the case that $14.25 million is a bargain for IBM, and that most of it should actually go to Novell (or whoever owns the dregs of what is left of that company) but it would all be marketing spin. Time to move on. It is unclear what the Xinuos lawsuit is about. Darl McBride has his fingers in it, but who else is involved? Will the SCO-IBM settlement play a part in getting the copyright claim dismissed? Who knows?
|
|
|
Authored by sk43999 on Oct 15, 2021 2:07:37 GMT
Judge just approved the settlement [SCOBK-1535]. Lots of rubber stamping still to go. Xinuos still wants it chance to beat a dead horse, so we'll have to see how that goes.
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Oct 20, 2021 19:36:55 GMT
Nice timing, sk43999 . My Pacer statement JUST came in and I was about to go check that myself. I wonder if PJ still has that red dress, and whether it's time for it yet. PJ, if you're listening, I hope you're doing well.
|
|
|
Authored by sk43999 on Nov 6, 2021 19:10:50 GMT
[IBM-1182]
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Per stipulation of the parties, all claims and counterclaims in this action are dismissed with prejudice - CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/5/21
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Nov 8, 2021 20:46:26 GMT
Woof. Almost 20 years later. I REALLY hope the Xinuos proceedings don't take that long.
Thanks, sk43999.
|
|
swmech
Veteran Member
Posts: 152
|
Authored by swmech on Nov 9, 2021 19:36:17 GMT
|
|